University Foundation

Policy Number: 
I.01.02
Reason for Policy: 

This policy defines the recognition process, the relationship, role, and responsibilities of the university foundation.

Entities Affected by this Policy: 

All units of the university and the university foundation

Responsible Office: 

For questions about this policy, please contact Office of the President at 541-346-3036 or pres@uoregon.edu.

Enactment & Revision History: 

01 July 2014 - Became University of Oregon policy by operation of law

Former Oregon Administrative Rule, Chapter 580, Division 046

30 June 2015 - Revisions approved by the interim university president

Policy: 

1. Recognition of a Foundation

1.1.The University of Oregon (University) president (President) may award recognition as an institution foundation (Foundation) to an entity that meets and maintains the requirements of these rules.

1.2. Only one entity may have recognition as the Foundation. All private support of the institution not provided directly to the University shall be through the Foundation, or affiliated or associated organizations.

1.3. To be eligible for recognition and to maintain continued recognition, the Foundation must:

a. Be created and operated with the primary purpose of support of the University;

b.Have as its purpose the solicitation, management and/or investment of private support for the benefit of the University; and

c. Be organized and operated in a manner to permit compliance with this policy.

1.4. An entity seeking recognition as the Foundation shall submit to the president for review its:

a. Articles of incorporation;

b.Bylaws;

c. Any other of its organic or enabling documents; and

d.All subsequent amendments.

1.5. The President shall notify the governing body of the Foundation in writing of recognition and that compliance with these rules is a condition of continued recognition.

2. Privileges and Responsibilities of Recognition

2.1.Privileges of recognition by the President may include:

a. License to use the institution name, logos, informal seals, symbols and marks; and

b. Other privileges and responsibilities as agreed upon in a Memorandum of Agreement.

2.2. No individual, group or entity not awarded recognition under this policy shall use any of the privileges described in this policy or otherwise make use of the University name except as expressly approved by the University by license or contract.

2.3. The Foundation's governing body promptly shall provide to the President a resolution of acceptance of the condition expressed in this policy and such resolution of acceptance, in the form of a Memorandum of Agreement, shall be reaffirmed annually.

3. University Foundation Organization, Affiliates, Relationships

3.1. The Foundation shall be organized and operated pursuant to the Oregon nonprofit corporation law.

3.2.The Foundation shall obtain and maintain status as a tax-exempt entity pursuant to Section 501(C)(3) of the federal Internal Revenue Code and other similar Oregon statutes.

3.3. The Foundation's articles of incorporation or other governing documents shall require that, upon its dissolution or withdrawal of recognition, the Foundation's net assets shall, within the limitations imposed by legal and fiduciary rights and responsibilities, be distributed to the University that awarded recognition, or another entity that has been awarded recognition by the University.

3.4. The Foundation may include as part of its organization one or more affiliates that support a particular unit or activity of the University but that are not separately incorporated.

a. An affiliate may have an advisory board that reports to and is advisory to the Foundation governing body. University employees may serve on an affiliate's advisory board so long as they do not comprise a majority of the advisory board membership nor a majority of any quorum of such body. University employees may provide staff support for an advisory board.

b.The Foundation shall not delegate to an advisory board of an affiliate its authority to hire personnel or to enter into contracts.

c. A member of each advisory board of an affiliate should serve on the Foundation governing body whenever possible.

d. No entity shall become an affiliate of the Foundation until the affiliation is approved in writing by the President.

3.5. The Foundation may establish or associate with another entity interested in the University, provided:

a. The President in writing approves of such relationship prior to any operations;

b. Such relationship does not impair or circumvent the requirements for Foundation independence; and

c. All for-profit activities are approved by the President.

4.Foundation Independence from the University

4.1. The Foundation shall be independent of the University.

4.2. To assure independence, the Foundation's governing body, employees, and agents:

a. Shall not be subject to control by the University or a University employee;

b. Shall not give the appearance that the University or any of its officers or employees control the Foundation or its property, including investment of gifts and endowments made to the Foundation.

c. No University employee may be a voting member of a governing body of the Foundation.

5.President's Responsibilities, Additional Rules

5.1. The President or designee shall be, and other University employees may be, ex officio, nonvoting members of the Foundation's governing body and of any executive or similar committee empowered to act for the governing body.

5.2.The President shall monitor Foundation activities and Foundation relationships to ensure compliance with this policy.

5.3. The President may establish additional written policies and guidelines applicable to the Foundation consistent with this policy.

6. Foundation and University Operational Procedures

6.1. A University employee may encourage gifts to the institution directly as well as through the Foundation.

6.2. In accepting gifts of any kinds, the Foundation shall:

a.Obtain University approval of any restrictive terms and conditions, and advise donors that a restricted gift for the benefit of the University may not be accepted without University approval; and

b. Coordinate with the University’s development office or other appropriate University officer regarding funding goals, programs or campaigns proposed by the University.

6.3. The Foundation shall report gifts to the Foundation and to the University as a result of Foundation activities. Such reports shall be made annually to the president.

6.4. Revenue received from a University activity, other than through normal development activities, shall not be deposited in a Foundation account.

6.5.The University and the Foundation shall develop and implement guidelines regarding the identification of funds so that the intended donee, whether University or Foundation, actually receives the funds, subject to the following:

a. If the Foundation is the intended recipient of funds made payable to the University, the funds shall first be deposited in a state account and then transferred to the Foundation.

b. Funds payable or gifts made to the University shall not be transferred to the Foundation unless accompanying documents demonstrate that the Foundation is the intended recipient.

c.If the Foundation deposits funds in its accounts or receives other gifts intended for the University, the Foundation shall transfer those funds or gifts to the University.

6.6.Salaries, consulting fees, loans, perquisites or other benefits provided to or on behalf of a University employee, other than a student employee, by the Foundation shall be:

a. Approved by the Board of Trustees when paid to the President or other employee appointed directly by the Board of Trustees.

b. Approved by the President in writing.

c.Paid by the Foundation to the University, which in turn will make payments to the employee in accordance with normal University practice.

d. This subsection is not applicable to reimbursements for actual and necessary travel and other expenses incurred for authorized University or Foundation purposes that are reported by the Foundation to the President annually.

6.7. University Contract with Foundation:

a. The University may provide pursuant to a written contract limited and reasonable support to the Foundation, including but not limited to the cost of utilities and janitorial services and all or part of the salary and related personnel costs of staff support, from funds otherwise available to the University. As used in this policy, staff support is assistance by any personnel whose responsibilities and activities exclude policy making and other functions that would nullify the independence of the Foundation from the University.

b.The University shall contract with the Foundation regarding the terms and conditions for support and may contract for other purposes consistent with this policy. Any such contract and amendments thereto shall:

A.Accurately and fully describe the extent of such use and support and the consideration therefor;

B. Be approved by the President or their respective designees.

C. Funds received by the University because of a contract with the Foundation shall be placed in a current restricted account that is not a depository for donated or gift money.

7.Foundation Activities

7.1. Financial and other activities of the Foundation shall be administered and reported in accordance with law, prudent business practices and generally accepted accounting principles.

7.2. Audits and Financial Reports of the Foundation:

a. The Foundation shall be audited annually by a certified public accountant. The audit report shall be provided promptly to the President. The audit report shall be accompanied by a current list of Foundation officers, directors, trustees, managers and legal counsel and the officers of any group or entity described in Section 3.4 and 3.5 of this policy.

b. The Foundation shall permit the President, using University internal auditors, to inspect and audit all Foundation books and records at reasonable times. The Foundation shall provide such reports of and information on its financial status and operations as required by the President in order to assure conformance by the University and the Foundation with this policy.

8. Revocation of Recognition

8.1. The President may revoke recognition as provided therein, if the President finds that a Foundation or its operation conflict with this policy or the mission of the institution.

8.2. Prior to ordering revocation of recognition, the President shall notify the Foundation's governing body of the reasons that could form the bases for revocation of recognition. Within 30 days of receipt of the President's notification, the Foundation may in writing propose actions to remedy the deficiencies described by the President.

8.3. If the President approves the proposed actions, the Foundation's governing body shall implement the proposals within a time specified by the President.

8.4.If the President rejects the Foundation's proposed actions or finds that they are not adequately implemented, the President may revoke recognition by a written order to the Foundation's governing body specifying the reasons for revocation.

8.5.An order revoking recognition may be appealed to the Board of Trustees if filed with the University Secretary within 30 days of the date the President issues the order revoking recognition. The Board of Trustees shall review the President's decision but shall not reverse that decision unless the Board finds the President acted arbitrarily or capriciously.

8.6. An order revoking recognition shall terminate the Memorandum of Agreement and the privileges of recognition.

Download Policy

Chapter/Volume: 
  • Volume I: Governance
  • Chapter 1: Governance and board affairs

Information Security Program

Policy Number: 
IV.06.01
Reason for Policy: 

This policy grants authority to the University of Oregon Information Security Office to perform various security activities to protect the University’s data, computers, networks, and users.

Entities Affected by this Policy: 

All University personnel and external parties involved with using, requesting, approving, or accessing UO information assets.

Responsible Office: 

For questions about this policy, please contact the Chief Information Security Officer at (541) 346-9700 or security@uoregon.edu.

Enactment & Revision History: 

25 April 2016 - Approved by the university president as a permanent policy

15 December 2015 - Extended by the university president

25 June 2015 - Enacted as an emergency policy by the university interim president

This policy supersedes former OAR Chapter 580, Division 055.

Policy: 

This policy grants authority to the University of Oregon Information Security Office, a unit within Information Services, to implement an Information Security Program to mitigate risk regarding information security. Responsibilities of the Information Security Program include, but are not limited to:

  • Develop policies, procedures, and guidelines for securing University systems, networks, and data based on applicable laws, regulations, and best practices
  • Consult with campus users and departments to investigate information security issues, perform risk assessments, and propose products and processes to mitigate risk discovered
  • Monitor the University networks to identify malicious activity
  • Provide incident response for information security incidents
  • Increase campus awareness of information security through training and communication
  • Use frameworks to ensure that information security is built into current and new systems. Identify risks to the security of information, systems, and users in order to mitigate these risks to levels acceptable by University Administration.

The University of Oregon Information Security Office will have information security responsibilities over all University data, computers, and networks. Each member of the University community has a role in protecting the security of information including faculty, staff, students, vendors, and contractors. The University of Oregon Information Security Office will implement an Information Security Program to mitigate risk regarding information security. There will be a number of duties performed by the University of Oregon Information Security Office to carry out the responsibilities of the Information Security Program. The Program will include, but is not limited to, the following activities:

1. Development of Policies, Procedures, and Guidelines

The University of Oregon Information Security Office will draft policies, procedures, and guidelines related to information security. These may be overarching policies such as data classification polices or specific technical guidelines such as how to encrypt hard drives. The policies, procedures, and guidelines will be developed in conjunction with Campus IT Leadership to ensure that they will be effective in mitigating risk in the many diverse Campus units. Additional identified groups will also be included in the review to gather input. The policies, procedures, and guidelines will be developed based on state and federal laws and regulations by which the University is bound as well as best practices in the information security community. Changes in policy will be reviewed by the Policy Advisory Council. Changes in procedures will be reviewed by Campus IT Leadership.

2. Perform Risk Assessments

The University of Oregon Information Security Office will perform risk assessments of central systems to determine gaps where additional security controls are needed. If gaps are discovered, recommendations will be made to mitigate potential risk. The University of Oregon Information Security Office will also work with Campus units who request a risk assessment of their systems. Occasional Campus-wide security assessments will be performed in conjunction with Campus IT Leadership.

3. Operate Security Systems

The University of Oregon Information Security Office will operate systems that monitor the security of UO computers and networks. Examples of these types of systems include the campus-provided antivirus solution and our malware detection system

4. Perform Network Monitoring

The University of Oregon Information Security Office will monitor the University networks for malicious activity. These can include, but are not limited to, the presence of viruses and malware, users transmitting or receiving larger than normal amounts of data, violations of the Acceptable Use Policy , systems being used to relay spam, and internal or external individuals attempting to break into University systems. The University of Oregon Information Security Office will use these network monitoring capabilities to notify individuals and University units of systems where problems are detected. By default the Information Security Office will not investigate monitored data at the level of an individual user, but will investigate at the individual level when an appropriate triggering event occurs on its Security Systems (such as the antivirus system). Authorized investigators include Information Security Office staff and also IT Professionals in the units where an event is triggered."

5. Data Retention Limits

Data (construed to include all personally-identifiable information in addition to other forms of retained data) from security systems and network monitoring systems will be maintained for a maximum of one year unless otherwise required by law. The need for data retention up to this maximum limit will be reviewed on a periodic basis to determine if data can be retained for a shorter period of time. Any retention of data beyond the maximum of one year will require a revision to policy per the regular policy press.

6. Lead Security Incident Response

The University of Oregon Information Security Office will provide security incident response in the event of breaches on University systems. This will include forming a Security Incident Response Team, performing forensics to gather relevant data, and providing a report on whether and how the system was compromised, what type of data was resident on the system, and if the data appears to have been viewed or exfiltrated by an unauthorized individual.

7. Provide Security Awareness, Training, and Communication

The University of Oregon Information Security Office will raise the awareness of information security through awareness materials, website presence, and awareness talks at University meetings. The University of Oregon Information Security Office will also provide training for technical and non-technical Faculty, Staff, Students, Vendors, and Contractors on security tools that can be used to mitigate security risk. Finally, the University of Oregon Information Security Office will provide communications to Campus IT Leadership on how to remediate security vulnerabilities when they are discovered.

8. Use Security Frameworks to Provide a Consistent Security Posture

The University of Oregon Information Security Office will use the Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to address the security posture of the University. By standardizing on one framework the University of Oregon Information Security Office will be able to provide for consistent and repeatable security assessments and recommendations across all University systems, data, and networks.

Chapter/Volume: 
  • Volume IV: Finance, Administration and Infrastructure
  • Chapter 6: Information technology

Data Security Incident Response

Policy Number: 
IV.06.03
Reason for Policy: 

This policy will provide for a consistent and repeatable process for responding to data security incidents.

Entities Affected by this Policy: 

All University of Oregon data users

Responsible Office: 

For questions about this policy, please contact the Chief Information Security Officer at 541-346-9700 or security@uoregon.edu

Enactment & Revision History: 

25 April 2016 - Enacted as a permanent policy by the university president

15 December 2015 - Extended by the university president

25 June 2015 - Enacted as an emergency policy by the interim university president

This policy supersedes Fiscal Policy Manual 56.350.240

Policy: 

The University of Oregon is committed to compliance with all applicable state and federal and laws and regulations relating to the compromise of Sensitive Data (as detailed in the University of Oregon Data Classification Policy).

Data Exposure Investigation: In the event that paper or electronic records containing sensitive data are subject to an unauthorized release or access to unauthorized persons, The University of Oregon Data Security Incident Response Procedure must be used to determine whether any sensitive data have in fact been exposed, what specific data were exposed, the impact of the exposure, and what actions are required for legal compliance related to the exposure.

Notification: The decision on notification will be made by the Office of the General Counsel based on applicable Federal and State law.

Security Incident Reports Annual Summary: On an annual basis a summary of Security Incident Reports will be produced by the CISO that will detail the number of Reports issued and how many of the Reports required notification (upon the decision of the Office of the General Counsel). Given the nature of these investigations, these summary reports cannot risk further exposure of sensitive information, and so can be expected to be minimal in their level of detail beyond the two requirements stipulated herein (namely, a summary accounting of the number of Reports issued and how many of the Reports required notification).

Scope of Duty to Report: Any University of Oregon faculty, staff, student, vendor or contractor who has a reasonable cause to believe that sensitive data has been exposed to unauthorized persons must immediately notify the UO Information Security Office. Individuals can either send an email to security@ithelp.uoregon.edu or call (541) 346-5837. Employees who identify themselves and make a good faith report of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse are protected from retaliation, in accordance with Oregon law. UO will maintain confidentiality for employees reporting suspected irregularities, misconduct, safety issues, or other concerns to the extent possible under the law.

Chapter/Volume: 
  • Volume IV: Finance, Administration and Infrastructure
  • Chapter 6: Information technology

Information Asset Classification & Management

Policy Number: 
IV.06.02
Reason for Policy: 

This policy provides the University of Oregon’s approach for classifying data and information systems (“information assets”) according to their potential level of risk to the University. The policy and associated procedures also assign roles and responsibilities for protecting information assets and detail how such assets must be protected based on their classifications.

Entities Affected by this Policy: 

All users of University of Oregon information

Responsible Office: 

For questions about this policy, please contact the Chief Information Security Office at 541-346-5837 or infosec@uoregon.edu.

Enactment & Revision History: 

02 July 2019 - Amendments approved by the university president

25 April 2016 - Enacted as a permanent policy by the university president

15 December 2015 - Extended by the university president

25 June 2015 - Enacted as an emergency policy by the interim university president

This policy supersedes Fiscal Policy Manual 56.350.200-230 and UO Policy 10.00.01

Policy: 

Summary

The purpose of this policy is to outline the acceptable approach for classifying university information assets into risk levels to facilitate determination of access authorization and appropriate security control. The requirement to safeguard information assets must be balanced with the need to support the pursuit of university objectives. The value of data as an institutional resource increases through its widespread and appropriate use; its value diminishes through misuse, misinterpretation, or unnecessary restrictions to its access.

 

Definitions

 

Data Availability refers to methods for ensuring that required data is always accessible when needed, in accordance with University retention policy.

 

Data Confidentiality refers to methods for ensuring that access to sensitive data is limited to authorized individuals.

 

Data Integrity refers to methods for ensuring that data is complete, accurate, consistent, and safeguarded from unauthorized modification.

 

University Data refers to data owned by or in the custody of the University.

 

 

Roles and Responsibilities

Chief Information Security Officer
The Chief Information Security Officer develops policies and procedures to secure University information assets and comply with state, federal, and international laws and regulations applicable to the University of Oregon.

 

Data Trustee
The Data Trustee for all University Data is the Provost or their designees who have planning, policy-level, and management responsibility for data within their designated functional area(s). Data Trustees’ responsibilities include:

  • Assigning and overseeing Data Stewards
  • Overseeing the establishment of UO information asset policies.
  • Determining statutory, regulatory and other University requirements for UO information assets.
  • Promoting data quality and appropriate use.

Data Stewards
Data Stewards are University officials having direct operational-level responsibility for the management of one or more types of data. Data Stewards must be authorized by the appropriate Data Trustee and are generally associate deans, associate vice presidents, directors or above, or research principle investigators within the scope of work of a research project. Data Stewards’ responsibilities include:

  • Assigning and overseeing Data Custodians.
  • The application of this and related policies and procedures to the systems, data, and other information resources under their care or control.
  • Assigning data classification levels in accordance with this policy and associated procedures.
  • Collaborating with the CISO in identifying and implementing appropriate administrative and technical safeguards outlined in the UO Minimum Information Security Conrols Standard, for protecting information assets (see Related Resources, below).
  • Communicating and providing education on the required safeguards for data to authorized users and Data Custodians.
  • Authorizing access, both logical and physical, only to authorized individuals who have a business need – as defined by law and university policies - to access specific data or other information assets.
  • Authorizing remote access to information assets to only authorized individuals who have a business need – as defined by law and university policies - to access through a secured system approved by the Chief Information Security Officer.

In cases where multiple Data Stewards collect and maintain the same data elements, the Data Stewards must work together, in collaboration with the CISO, to apply the UO Minimum Information Security Controls.

 

Data Custodians
Data Custodians are university personnel or designated third-party agents responsible for the operation and management of information systems which collect, manage, process, or provide access to University Data. Data Custodians must be authorized by the appropriate Data Stewards following procedures outlined in the UO Minimum Information Security Controls Standard (see Related Resources, below). Data Custodians’ responsibilities include:

  • Applying the UO Minimum Information Security Controls appropriate to the classification level of the data and other information assets in their custody
  • Complying with applicable University acceptable use and computer security policies, standards, and procedures.
  • Managing Data Consumer access as authorized by appropriate Data Stewards
  • Following data handling and protection policies and procedures established by Data Stewards and the CISO.

Data Consumers
Data Consumers are the individual University community members or third-party agents who have been granted access to University Data (wherever it is stored) in order to perform assigned duties or in fulfillment of assigned roles or functions for the University. This access is granted solely for legitimate University purposes. Data Consumers’ responsibilities include:

  • Following the policies and procedures established by the appropriate Data Stewards, Data Custodians, and the CISO.
  • Complying with University policies and federal, international, and state laws and regulations associated with the University Data and information system use.
  • Implementing safeguards for protecting data as prescribed by appropriate Data Stewards and the CISO.
  • Reporting any unauthorized access or data misuse to the Information Security Office, the appropriate Data Trustee, Steward, or Custodian, for remediation.

A current list of UO Data Trustees, Data Stewards, and Data Custodians is available in the UO Data Security Classification Table found below in Related Resources.

Data Classification
Data Stewards must classify all University data – digital or printed - into risk levels to provide the basis for understanding and applying the appropriate level of security controls. These classification levels consider the state and federal legal protections, contractual agreements, ethical considerations, or strategic or proprietary worth. Data can also be classified as a result of the application of “prudent stewardship,” where the reason to protect the data is to reduce the possibility of harm to individuals or to the institution.

Data Classification Levels

The classification level assigned to data will guide Data Trustees, Data Stewards, Data Custodians, functional and technical project teams, and any others who may create, obtain, process, transmit or store data, in the security protections and access authorization mechanisms appropriate for that data. Data Stewards must classify University Data as one of the following risk levels:

 

  • Low Risk (or Green)
    Data is classified as Low Risk if the loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the data would have minimal strategic, compliance, operational, financial, or reputational risk to the University. The integrity of Low Risk data is of primary importance and must be protected. The appropriate Data Trustee or Steward must authorize release of Low Risk data. Refer to the UO Data Security Classification Table (see Related Resources, below) for examples of Low Risk data.
  • Moderate Risk (or Amber)Data is classified as Moderate Risk if the loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the data would have moderate strategic, compliance, operational, financial, or reputational risk to the University. Integrity and availability of Moderate Risk data are of primary importance and must be protected; privacy and confidentiality should be protected as appropriate. Access to Moderate Risk data must be authorized by the Data Trustee or Steward who is responsible for the data, as needed. Data access authorization may be provided to individuals as part of their job roles or responsibilities. Refer to the Data Security Classification Table (see Related Resources, below) for examples of Moderate Risk data.
  • High Risk (or Red)
    Data is classified as High Risk (the most sensitive/critical classification) if the loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the data would have high strategic, compliance, operational, financial, or reputational risk to the University. Privacy, confidentiality, integrity, and availability are important and must be protected. Access to High Risk data must be controlled from creation to destruction, and shall be granted only to those persons affiliated with the University who require such access in order to perform their job, or to those individuals permitted by state or federal law. The confidentiality of data is of primary importance, although the integrity of the data must also be ensured. Access to High Risk data must be requested from, and authorized by, the Data Trustee or Steward who is responsible for the data.

High Risk data includes information protected by law. Note: some data that is not regulated may be classified as High Risk by the Data Trustees or Stewards due to proprietary, ethical, or privacy considerations. Refer to the Data Security Classification Table (see Related Resources, below) for examples of High Risk data.

 

Classification of Information Systems and Technology Components

Information systems and technology components, including computing and storage devices, mobile devices, network components, and applications, adopt the highest classification of the data that they process, store, or transmit. For example, a system that processes, stores, or transmits High Risk data is classified as a High Risk system; whereas a system that processes Moderate Risk data as the highest data classification level is classified as a Moderate Risk system.

 

In addition to data-specific risks, information systems components may also affect the safety of the UO community, through interference with operational technology (OT) such as building and industrial automated control systems and automation and supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems. An information system component is also classified as High, Moderate, or Low Risk if unauthorized access or modification or the loss of availability would have a high, moderate, or low safety risk respectively, to the UO community.

 

Data Security Requirements for the Classification Levels
The Chief Information Security Officer shall create and maintain security procedures for the various types of data use by the University. These requirements are outlined in the UO In addition, the CISO will create and maintain additional guidelines and procedures for appropriate handling of data including the Minimum Security Procedures for Handling Physical University Data (see Related Resources, below).

 

Chapter/Volume: 
  • Volume IV: Finance, Administration and Infrastructure
  • Chapter 6: Information technology
Original Source: 
UO Policy Statement

Student Conduct Code

Policy Number: 
III.01.01
Reason for Policy: 

The Student Conduct Code establishes community standards and procedures necessary to maintain and protect an environment conducive to learning and in keeping with the educational objectives of the University of Oregon. 

Entities Affected by this Policy: 

All students enrolled at the University of Oregon, Division of Student Life, and Academic Affairs

Responsible Office: 

For questions about this policy, please contact the Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards at (541) 346-1141 or conduct@uoregon.edu

Enactment & Revision History: 

12 September 2023 - Amended by the Board of Trustees at the recommendation of the Conduct Committee.

06 December 2022 - Amended by the Board of Trustees at the recommendation of the Conduct Committee.

15 August 2021 – Amendments from 20 May 2021 became effective

20 May 2021 – Amended by the Board of Trustees at the recommendation of the Conduct Committee; effective date of changes 15 August 2021

15 August 2020 – Amendments from 4 June 2020 became effective

4 June 2020 – Amended by the Board of Trustees at the recommendation of the Conduct Committee; effective date of changes 15 August 2020

23 May 2019 - Amended by the Board of Trustees at the recommendation of the Conduct Committee

05 March 2019 - Amended by the Board of Trustees at the recommendation of the Conduct Committee

17 December 2018 - Temporary Emergency Changes Approved by the President

08 June 2018 - Amended by the Board of Trustees

29 June 2015 - Technical revisions made by the Secretary

04 June 2015 - Amended by the Board of Trustees

11 September 2014 - Amended by the Board of Trustees

01 July 2014 - Become UO policy by operation of law

2006 - Enacted as OAR Chapter 571, Division 21

Policy: 

Section 1: Introduction

The University of Oregon’s mission statement states, “The University of Oregon is a comprehensive public research university committed to exceptional teaching, discovery, and service. We work at a human scale to generate big ideas. As a community of scholars, we help individuals question critically, think logically, reason effectively, communicate clearly, act creatively, and live ethically.” As a community of scholars,

  • We value the passions, aspirations, individuality, and success of the students, faculty, and staff who learn and work here.
  • We value academic freedom, creative expression, and intellectual discourse.
  • We value our diversity and seek to foster equity and inclusion in a welcoming, safe, and respectful community.
  • We value, and endeavor to learn from, the unique history and cultures of Oregon that shape our identity and spirit.
  • We value our shared charge to steward resources sustainably and responsibly.

The Student Conduct Code sets forth the community standards and procedures that maintain and protect an environment that is conducive to learning and supports the educational objectives of the University of Oregon.

Section II: Definitions

  1. “Cannabis” means the parts, product, and derivatives of the plant Cannabis sativa, indica, ruderalis, and hybrid strains, regardless of the delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol level, and is a federally controlled substance. Pursuant to federal law, the use of cannabis, including medical use, is prohibited on University Premises and at University Sponsored Activities. Cannabis, for the purpose of this policy, does not include FDA approved substances or industrial hemp as permitted by federal law.
  1. “Case Manager” means a University employee who is designated by the Director to investigate and/or determine the appropriate resolution of an alleged violation of the Student Conduct Code.
  1. “Complainant” generally means the University. In reports of discrimination or harassment, Complainant may also mean the Student that has been the subject of another Student’s alleged misconduct.  A Student Complainant has the same opportunities under the Student Conduct Code as are provided to the Respondent.
  1. “Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards” is the person designated by the University to be responsible for the administration and interpretation of the Student Conduct Code, or their designee. This person may be referred to as “Director”.
  1. “Person Reporting” means any person who reports an allegation. This person is not automatically considered the Complainant.
  1. “Policy” means the written rules and regulations of the University.
  1. “Respondent” means any Student or Student Organization reported to have violated the Student Conduct Code.
  1. “Student” means any person registered or enrolled in a University academic course or program, and any person admitted to the University who is on University Premises for any purpose related to the person’s registration or enrollment, or any person who participates in University programs that require Student status. Student includes any person who was a student in the previous term and is eligible for registration.
  1. “Student Organization” means any group of University of Oregon Students meeting the University’s criteria for organizational recognition or registration established by the University or its units, colleges, or departments. Jurisdiction is retained for behavior that occurred when the Student Organization was recognized of registered, regardless of current status.
  1. “Support Person” means any person who accompanies a Respondent or Complainant for the purpose of providing support, advice, or guidance. Any limitations on the scope of a support person are defined in written procedures or other relevant University policy. Witnesses or other Respondents are not allowed to serve as Support Persons.
  1. “University Appellate Body” means the person or persons designated to consider an appeal from the outcome of an administrative conference. The appellate body for Discriminatory Misconduct and Student Organization conduct cases will be designated by the Vice President for Student Life. The appellate body for all other conduct cases will be designated by the University President. 
  1. “University Official” means a person having assigned University responsibilities who is performing their University duties. This includes Students who have been authorized to act on behalf of the University, such as resident assistants.
  1. “University Premises” includes all land, buildings, or grounds owned, leased, operated, controlled, or supervised by the University and adjacent sidewalks and streets.
  1. “University Sponsored Activity” means any activity that is directly initiated or supervised by the University or a Student Organization, on or off University Premises.

Section III: Scope, Authority, and Jurisdiction

  1. The Director of Student Conduct and Community Standards (Director) develops procedures for the administration of the student conduct system.
  1. Allegations of misconduct may be reported to the Director at any time, whether or not the Respondent is currently enrolled or registered. The Director has the authority to determine whether or not the allegation merits further response, including referral to the University student conduct system.
  1. The Student Conduct Code applies to each Student for behavior that occurs from the time of admission, registration, or enrollment (whichever occurs first) through the actual awarding of a degree or complete withdrawal as defined by the University, regardless of when the behavior is reported.
    1. It applies to behavior that occurs during periods of suspension from the University.
    2. It applies even if the Respondent subsequently withdraws from the University.
    3. It applies to behavior that occurs between periods of enrollment unless the Respondent completely withdraws before the deadline to register for the next term. For Students enrolled in the spring term, jurisdiction is maintained until the deadline to register for the fall term.
  1. The Student Conduct Code applies to all activities on University Premises and during any University Sponsored Activity regardless of location. The University may apply the Student Conduct Code to Student behavior which occurs off-campus in which the University can demonstrate a clear and distinct interest as an academic institution regardless of where the conduct occurs and a) which causes substantial disruption to the University community or any of its members, b) which involves academic work or any University records, documents, or identifications, or c) which seriously threatens the health or safety of any person.
  1. Proceedings under the Student Conduct Code are separate from civil or criminal proceedings and may, at the discretion of the Director, be carried out prior to, simultaneously with, or following civil or criminal proceedings.
  1. Allegations of misconduct by Student Organizations will be managed using the same process (Section V. Resolution Process) as individual Students.

Section IV: Prohibited Conduct

  1. Academic Misconduct
    1. Assisting in the commission of academic misconduct: Helping another engage in academic misconduct.
    2. Cheating: Accessing or using of unauthorized materials, information, tools, or study aids.
    1. Fabrication: Providing false information in fulfillment of an academic assignment, exercise, or other requirement, including making up data, sources, efforts, events, or results and recording, reporting, or using them as authentic.
    1. Multiple submissions of work: Using or submitting the same or substantially the same academic work for credit more than once, unless specifically authorized by the instructor of record for the course in which it’s being submitted for credit. If authorized, appropriate disclosure and citation is required.
    1. Plagiarism: Presenting another’s material as one’s own, including using another’s words, results, processes or ideas, in whole or in part, without giving appropriate credit. Plagiarism is contingent on the content of the submitted work product, regardless of whether the unattributed material was included intentionally or unintentionally. The use of material taken from any source—whether directly quoted, paraphrased, or otherwise adapted—must be attributed to that source.Plagiarism also includes the submission of material generated by others. This may include artificial intelligence (AI) content generators and generative AI tools such as ChatGPT; websites with a question-and-answer feature such as Course Hero, Chegg, and Bing; assistance from tutors or online language translators that results in unoriginal work; and work that is purchased or otherwise prepared by another individual.
    2. Unauthorized Collaboration: Working with others in the submission of an assignment, exercise, or other academic requirement for assessment when not expressly permitted by the instructor.This section is not intended to prohibit the type of collaboration that promotes productive discourse and learning between students, such as engaging with lecture materials or course texts; discussing subject matter concepts, ideas, and themes; talking through problem-solving strategies and approaches; or study groups working to prepare for an exam. Unless expressly prohibited by the instructor, such collaboration is encouraged to the extent that students remain able to submit work for assessment which reflects their own individual interpretations, analysis, and conclusions. This level of collaboration will not constitute a violation of the Code, unless expressly prohibited by the instructor.
    1. Unauthorized recording and/or use: Recording and/or dissemination of instructional content, or other intellectual property, without the express written permission of the instructor(s), intellectual property owner or the Accessible Education Center.
  1. Substance Use Misconduct
    1. Alcohol.
      1. Possession or consumption of alcohol by those under the legal drinking age.
      2. Furnishing of alcohol to a person under the legal drinking age.
      3. Possession or consumption of alcohol by a person of the legal drinking age in unauthorized areas or furnishing of an alcoholic beverage to any person in unauthorized areas.
      4. Causing another to ingest alcohol without consent.
    1. Cannabis.
      1. Use, possession, or procurement of cannabis except as expressly permitted by both State and Federal law. Per Oregon law, possession of cannabis by someone under the age of 21 includes possession by consumption, permitted the consumption occurred within the past 24 hours.
      2. Furnishing, cultivation, manufacturing, distributing, or selling cannabis except as expressly permitted by both State and Federal law.
      3. Causing another to ingest cannabis without consent.
    1. Other controlled substances.
      1. Use, possession, or procurement of a Controlled Substance except as expressly permitted by both State and Federal law.
      2. Furnishing, cultivation, manufacturing, distributing, or selling of a Controlled Substance, except as expressly permitted by both state and federal law.
      3. Causing another to ingest a controlled substance without consent.
    1. Smoking and tobacco.
      1. Smoking and tobacco use, including “vaping,” is prohibited on University owned or controlled property by University Policy.
      2. Possession of tobacco products and inhalant delivery systems (“e-cigarettes”) by those under 21 years of age on University Premises or at a University Sponsored Activity, is prohibited in accordance with state law. This does not prohibit the use or possession of products that have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for sale as a tobacco cessation product, provided the product is marketed, sold, and used solely for the approved purpose.
  1. General Misconduct
    1. Attempts, threats, or inciting others: Attempting to, threatening to, or inciting others to engage in any of the conduct prohibited by this Code.
    1. Damage and/or destruction: Damage to or destruction of University property or the property of another.
    1. Disruptive behavior: Engaging in behavior that could reasonably be foreseen to cause, or that causes, the disruption of, obstruction of, or interference with:
      1. the process of instruction, research, service, administration, administering the Student Conduct Code, or any other University Sponsored Activities,
      2. an environment conducive to learning, or
      3. freedom of movement on University Premises, either pedestrian or vehicular.
    1. Failure to comply: Failure to comply with any reasonable directive of University or public officials in the performance of their duties. This includes but is not limited to, failures to: adhere to no-contact-directives, remove oneself from University Premises, complete conduct outcomes and/or sanctions, and cease and desist.
    1. Falsification: Knowingly providing/presenting, creating, or possessing falsified or forged materials, records, or documents. Additionally, intentionally initiating any false report or providing false or misleading information to a person acting in their capacity as a University or public official.
    1. Gambling: Any activity not approved by the University in which a person stakes or risks something of value upon the outcome of a contest of chance or a future contingent event not under the control or influence of the person, upon an agreement or understanding that the person or someone else will receive something of value in the event of a certain outcome, except as permitted by law.
    1. Harassment: Engaging in behavior that is sufficiently severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive to a degree that it interferes with a reasonable person’s ability to work, learn, live, or participate in or benefit from the services, activities, or privileges provided by the University.
    1. Hazing: Intentionally subjecting another to a situation or action that a reasonable person would foresee as causing mental or physical discomfort, embarrassment, injury, or ridicule. Individual acceptance of or acquiescence to any activity does not affect a determination of whether the activity constitutes hazing. This includes compelled participation in behavior which would violate the law and/or University Policy. Hazing may include, but is not limited to, sleep deprivation or causing excessive fatigue, physical or psychological shock, compelled ingestion of a substance, and other activities not consistent with the parent organization’s rules and regulations.
    1. Physical contact: Physical contact that endangers or harms the health or safety of any person. This may include “Violent Behavior” as defined by the Campus Violence Prevention Policy.
    1. Public Urination or Defecation: To urinate or defecate in any public location not specifically designated as a restroom.
    1. Retaliation or Obstruction: Any adverse action taken toward a person who is, or is perceived to be, engaged in an investigation, a report, or student conduct process, because that person participated in the University’s process, or to deter a person from participating in the University’s process. Includes retaliation as defined by the Discrimination Complaint and Response Policy.
    1. Safety hazard: Tampering with firefighting equipment or smoke detectors, causing a false alarm, or endangering the health or safety of others.
    1. Theft: Unauthorized taking or possession of property of another, including goods, services, and other valuables.
    1. Threatening behavior: Behavior that constitutes a threat, as defined by the Campus Violence Prevention Policy.
    2. Unathorized access or use: Unauthorized access to, entry to, or use of physical or virtual space, including misuse of access privileges. Unauthorized use of University property or services, or the property of others. This includes conduct which violates the Access Control Policy and the Facilities Scheduling Policy.
    1. Unwanted contact: Repeated contact or communication to another person when the contacting person knows or should know that the contact or communication is unwanted by the other person and:
      1. The contact would cause a reasonable person fear of physical harm; or
      1. The contacting person knows or should know that the contact or communication significantly impacts the other person’s ability to perform the activities of daily life.
    1. Misuse of computing resources: Violation of UO acceptable use of computing resources policy pertaining to use of computing or network resources, including:
      1. Unauthorized access to, or sharing of information necessary to access, accounts, courses, course materials, or computer labs;
      2. Commercial or illegal use of electronic or computer resources; or
      3. Violation of copyright law.
  1.  
    1. Violation of law: Any action or behavior that violates federal, state, or local law.
    1. Violation of University Policy: Any action or behavior, by a Student that violates University Policy.
    1. Weapons.
      1. Possession of explosive materials, firearms, ammunition or other dangerous weapons is prohibited on University Premises and at University Sponsored Activities, unless expressly authorized by law and applicable University Policy. Includes violation of the Firearm Policy.
      2. Use of explosive materials, firearms, ammunition, other dangerous weapons, or any object or substance used as a weapon is prohibited on University Premises and at University Sponsored Activities, unless expressly authorized by law and applicable University Policy.
      3. Weapons, possessed, used, or handled off-campus in a manner that is unlawful or contributes to any other violation of the Code is also prohibited.
  1. Discriminatory Misconduct
    1. Any action or behavior prohibited by the University of Oregon Prohibited Discrimination and Retaliation Policy.

Section V: Resolution Process

  1. Report. The Director determines within a reasonable time whether a report alleges a potential violation of the Student Conduct Code and whether the matter should proceed through the conduct process.
  1. Student Rights. If the matter will proceed through the conduct process, the Respondent will:
    1. Be informed of the alleged violation(s) and the alleged misconduct upon which the report is based.
    2. Be informed of the process.
    3. Have the opportunity to meet, in person or virtually, with a Case Manager to review the report, the process, and options for disposition of the case in advance of an administrative conference.
    4. Have the opportunity to access, prior to an administrative conference, any documentation in possession of the Director that may be relied upon in decision making, subject to limitations from policies, regulations, and State and Federal law. What documentation is available, and how it may be accessed, is defined by written procedure.
    5. Have the opportunity to respond to the allegations to the Director or their designee in an administrative conference and
      1. Have a reasonable amount of time to prepare for the conference;
      2. Have the opportunity to propose relevant witnesses;
      3. Have the opportunity to submit questions to the Director for witnesses involved; and
      4. Have the opportunity to be accompanied by a Support Person
  1. Notice and Administrative Conference.
    1. The Director assesses whether an informal resolution, alternative resolution, formal student conduct action, or other process is appropriate. If the Director deems formal student conduct action to be appropriate, the Director will issue a written notice to the Respondent via Respondent’s official University of Oregon e-mail address. All communications sent by the Director are considered received when sent. In cases involving Student Organizations, the notice will be emailed to the organization’s representative (normally the president on file with ASUO, the Office of Fraternity & Sorority Life, or the Center for Student Involvement).
    2. Notice. The notice will identify whether the Respondent may be subject to suspension, expulsion, or negative transcript notation. If the Director receives additional information which could elevate the potential sanction to suspension, expulsion, or transcript notation, the Director will issue a new notice to the Respondent informing them of the additional information and potential sanction(s).
    3. The Case Manager will schedule an informational meeting as a part of the above notice. The informational meeting is a meeting between a Respondent and a Case Manager to review the report and relevant information, explain the student conduct process, and review possible options for resolving the matter. Respondents need not provide a response to the allegation(s) in this meeting.
    4. After the informational meeting, the Case Manager will determine whether the case requires an administrative conference. The Respondent may also request an administrative conference. A Student who agrees to resolve violations without an administrative conference may waive their right to appeal. Such a waiver will be knowing, voluntary, and explicit.
    5. If the Respondent, after receiving notice of the administrative conference does not appear for the conference, the conference will proceed without the Respondent.
    6. Following the administrative conference, the Case Manager, applying a preponderance of the evidence standard, will determine if any violation of the Student Conduct Code occurred. The Case Manager will determine any sanctions(s) to be imposed for violation(s). In cases involving allegations of Discriminatory Misconduct, the sanction decision will be made by the Director.
    7. In determining if a Student Organization is in violation, in addition to the above, the Case Manager may consider whether:
      1. The violation arises out of a group-sponsored, organized, financed, or endorsed activity or event;
      2. The organization provides the impetus for the violation;
      3. The violation occurs on the premises owned or operated by the group;
      4. A group leader has knowledge of the violation being likely to occur before it occurs and fails to take corrective action; or
      5. A pattern of individual violations is found to have existed without proper and appropriate group control, remedy, or sanction
  1. Alternate Dispute Resolution Processes. The Director and Respondent may determine that an alternate dispute resolution process (facilitated dialogue, mediation, etc.) is appropriate. Any case resolved through an alternate dispute resolution process may not be appealed and does not result in a finding of a conduct violation.
  1. Accommodations for Students with Disabilities. A Student requesting an accommodation must follow the appropriate process for requesting an accommodation through the Accessible Education Center. The Accessible Education Center will make a determination regarding the request and notify the appropriate parties.
  1. Action Plan. When a Student or Student Organization is found to be in violation of the Student Conduct Code, the Director will develop an action plan intended to promote personal reflection and growth, repair any harm caused, and help the Student or Student Organization realign with institutional values. The following describes the outcomes and sanctions that may be imposed, individually or in various combinations, on any Student or Student Organization as part of an action plan. An administrative sanction may be deferred for a designated length of time.
    1. Outcomes.
      1. Educational Outcome: The Student or Student Organization is required to complete a project or activity designed to promote learning and prompt changes to Student behavior and prevent further misconduct. Educational outcomes may include, but are not limited to, workshops, seminars, meetings, assignments, and substance abuse assessments.
      2. Reflective Outcome: The Student or Student Organization is required to complete a project or activity designed to promote self-reflection on one’s actions and the impact of those actions on others.
      3. Restorative Outcome: The Student or Student Organization is required to complete a project or activity designed to address the impact of the behavior and repair harm caused to any person and/or community.
    1. Administrative Sanctions.
      1. Conduct Warning. The Student or Student Organization is given written notice that the conduct engaged in is inconsistent with University standards and expectations and informed that future violations of the Student Conduct Code may result in the imposition of more serious sanctions.
      2. Disciplinary Probation. A period of probation may be imposed during which any violations of the Student Conduct Code will result in more serious sanctions than might be otherwise imposed. A Student or Student Organization on probation may lose designated privileges during the period of probation.
      3. Suspension.
        1. Individual Suspension. The Student is separated from the University for a specified period. A Student who has been suspended from the University shall not be permitted to reside in University-owned or operated facilities and may not participate in any University Sponsored Activity.
        2. Group Suspension. A Student Organization loses University recognition or registration and all associated privileges for a specified period.
      4. Expulsion. The Student is permanently separated from the University. A Student who has been expelled from the University shall not be permitted to reside in University-owned or operated facilities.
      5. Revocation of Degree. An academic degree previously awarded by the University may be revoked if it was obtained by fraud or a significant part of the work submitted in fulfillment of, and indispensable to, the requirements for such degree constitutes academic misconduct. The Academic Requirements Committee may, upon appeal, stipulate the requirements for obtaining a degree.
      6. University Housing Transfer or Eviction. As a result of a Student Conduct Code violation, the University may administratively transfer a resident to an alternate housing assignment, or may evict the resident from their housing assignment. Students who are evicted due to a conduct violation are no longer eligible for University Housing. 
      7. Negative Notation on Transcript. Entry of the fact of violation on the Student’s permanent academic record may be imposed at the discretion of the Director. After the expiration of the period of time, if any, set by the Director, the notation is removed.
      8. Exclusion. The Student is not permitted to participate in University Sponsored Activities, or appear at or be present on all, or a specified portion of, University Premises without advance written permission from the Director.
      9. Loss of Privileges. The Student or Student Organization is denied specified privileges normally associated with Student status or recognized Student Organization status, such as participation in or sponsorship of University activities, use of University facilities or services, or living in University-owned or supervised housing.
      10. Restitution. The Student or Student Organization is required to replace or restore damaged, stolen, or misappropriated property.
  1. Appeals. A Respondent may choose to appeal an administrative conference decision within ten business days. The appeal goes to the designated University Appellate Body. In cases involving Discriminatory Misconduct, the Complainant may also appeal the decision to the designated University Appellate Body. Faculty may appeal an academic misconduct finding when they are the Person Reporting or the instructor of record. Appeals must be in writing, state the basis for the appeal, and be delivered as directed to the Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards.
    1. Except for new information, an appeal is limited to the case file. An appeal will only be accepted for one or more of the following purposes (Basis for Appeal):
      1. To determine whether there was any procedural irregularity that affected the outcome of the matter;
      2. To determine whether the action plan imposed was appropriate for the violation(s);
      3. To determine whether the finding is not supported by the preponderance of the evidence; and/or
      4. To consider new information that could alter a decision, only if such information could not have been known to the appealing party at the time of the administrative conference.
    1. After considering an appeal, the University Appellate Body may either modify the action plan or send the matter back to the Director with a recommendation for additional fact finding, other resolution, or dismissal of the case. If the University Appellate Body grants an appeal on the basis of “new information” the only action the University Appellate Body may take is to send it back to the Director with a recommendation for additional fact finding, other resolution, or dismissal of the case.

Section VI: Interim Action

The Director may impose an interim action(s) regarding a Student or Student Organization when, in the professional judgement of the Director or designee, it is necessary to address a substantial and immediate threat of harm to persons or property.

  1. Interim action may include, but is not limited to:
    1. Interim removal/suspension of the Student from the University;
    2. Interim removal from, or relocation within, University-owned or operated housing facilities;
    3. Restrictions on the Student’s presence on University Premises or at University Sponsored Activities; and/or
    4. An administrative hold which would prevent registration and the Student from obtaining an official copy of the Student’s transcript.
  1. When the interim action takes place, the Director will:
    1. Inform the Respondent of the reason for the interim action;
    2. Schedule a preliminary meeting and inform the Respondent of its date, place, and time. At the preliminary meeting, Respondent has the opportunity to explain why interim action should or should not be taken.
  1. Within two business days of the interim action, the preliminary meeting takes place. The Respondent may have a Support Person in attendance.
  1. Based on the reasonable evaluation of the information presented at the preliminary meeting, the Director will notify the Respondent of the decision, no later than the following business day, to:
    1. Dissolve the interim action and take no further action;
    2. Dissolve the interim action but proceed to an administrative conference; or
    3. Sustain or modify the interim action until such time as a resolution is reached following an administrative conference.
  1. An interim action is reviewed by Vice President for Student Life’s Designee at the request of the Respondent. The review provides an opportunity for the requesting party to explain in writing why an interim action need no longer be imposed, or should be altered. Subsequent review of the same emergency action may be requested, at most, every ten business days.

Section VII: Academic Misconduct Procedures

Regardless of the method of resolution, relevant University Officials, including faculty members, are required to file a written report of any academic misconduct with the Director.

  1. Director Resolution.
    1. In cases of suspected academic misconduct that are reported by relevant University Officials, the case resolution will be conducted in accordance with the procedures established in this Code.
  1. Academic Sanction.
    1. If the Respondent is found in violation of academic misconduct in a course, in addition to the Action Plan imposed through the regular student conduct procedures, the faculty member may assign an appropriate academic sanction, up to and including an “F” or “N” for the course.
    2. The Respondent may appeal an academic sanction to the designated University Official within the department, college, or school from which the academic sanction originated. 
    3. If there is a finding that the Respondent did not engage in academic misconduct, no academic sanction may be imposed.
  1. Withdrawing from a Course.
    1. A Respondent may not drop or withdraw from a course that is pending after the Respondent has been made aware of the alleged academic misconduct via notice from the Director.
    2. If a Respondent’s academic misconduct does not result in an academic sanction, the Respondent may withdraw from the course or change the course’s grading option no later than five business days after the decision or termination of Student Conduct Code proceedings without sanction.

Section VIII: Retention of Student Conduct Records

  1. Student Conduct Records and Files. Case reports will result in the development of a student conduct record in the name of the Respondent and Complainant, if applicable. These records will be maintained for a minimum of seven years in accordance with State of Oregon records policies and in compliance with federal legislation such as FERPA, the Clery Act, and Title IX.
  1. Petition for non-reportable records. Respondents may, under some circumstances, petition to the Director for a conduct record to be considered “non-reportable.” The Director’s decision is discretionary and may not be appealed. If the Director is compelled to report the record by lawful order, the approved petition will not apply.

Section IX: Student Conduct Code Adoption and Revision

  1. Any question of interpretation regarding the Student Conduct Code shall be referred to the Director for final determination.
  1. The Student Conduct Advisory Committee provides peer perspective on matters of student conduct and academic integrity at the University of Oregon. The Committee of Students, faculty, and staff serves a tripartite purpose for supporting the university student conduct system: Advising, Advocating, and Advancing.
    1. The Committee will assist the Director by:
      1. Advising. Review and make recommendations for changes to the Code and related procedures.
      2. Advocating. Provide educational outreach to university students, faculty, and staff.
      3. Advancing. Explore new and innovative ways to increase student and faculty awareness of and involvement in the student conduct program.
    1. The Director will provide the Committee with an annual report which includes:
      1. Articulation of currently published procedures
      2. Overview of previous year, including the activities of the Committee, trends regarding student behavior, and recommendations for the committee’s review.
  1. Upon approval by the Board of Trustees of the University of Oregon, this Student Conduct Code becomes effective and supersedes all previous policies pertaining to student discipline at the University of Oregon.
  1. This Code is not a contract, express or implied, between any applicant, student, staff or faculty member. This Code may be amended by the Board of Trustees of the University of Oregon, consistent with the Policy on Retention and Delegation of Authority.
Chapter/Volume: 
  • Volume III: Administration of Student Affairs
  • Chapter 1: Conduct and Student Activities
Original Source: 
Oregon Administrative Rule

Retention and Delegation of Authority

Policy Number: 
I.01.01
Reason for Policy: 

The Board of Trustees has ultimate governing authority for the University. The Retention and Delegation of Authority articulates lines of authority delegated to the President of the University (or the President's designee(s) from the Board of Trustees), and specifies which governing authorities require action or contemplation by the Board itself.

Entities Affected by this Policy: 

All units of the University.

Responsible Office: 

University Secretary, 541-346-3166, trustees@uoregon.edu

Enactment & Revision History: 

05 December 2023 - Amended by the Board of Trustees

01 March 2023 - Technical change in the reason for policy field to eliminate gendered pronoun applied by University Secretary

20 September 2021 - Amended by the Board of Trustees

03 March 2017 - Amended by the Board of Trustees

04 March 2015 - Amended by the Board of Trustees

12 June 2014 - Enacted by the Board of Trustees

Policy: 

Preamble

As provided in ORS 352.025, the Legislative Assembly has found that the State of Oregon will benefit from having public universities with governing boards that provide transparency, public accountability and support for the university and act in the best interests of both the university and the State of Oregon as a whole.

As provided in ORS 352.029, the Board of Trustees manages the affairs of the university by exercising and carrying out all of the powers, rights and duties that are expressly conferred upon the board by law, or that are implied by law or are incident to such powers, rights and duties.

As provided in ORS 352.087, the Board of Trustees may perform any other acts that in the judgment of the Board are required, necessary or appropriate to accomplish the rights and responsibilities granted to the board and the university by law.

As provided in ORS 352.096, the president of the university is the president of the faculty. The president is also the executive and governing officer of the university, except as otherwise provided by statute or action of the governing board. Subject to the supervision of the governing board, the president of the university has authority to direct the affairs of the university.

As provided in ORS 352.146, the president and professors constitute the faculty and as such have the immediate government and discipline of a university with a governing board and the students therein, except as otherwise provided by law or action of the Board of Trustees. The faculty may, subject to the supervision of the Board and ORS 352.089 prescribe the course of study to be pursued in the university and the textbooks used.

Nothing in this Policy affects any collective bargaining agreement entered into prior to the adoption of this Policy.

1.0         Authority of the Board of Trustees; Appointment of the President of the University

1.1         Board Authority. The Board of Trustees is the final University authority and has full control of the University and its property of various kinds. The Board may take any and all Board actions as it determines necessary or appropriate to the extent permitted by law. Board actions have precedence over other policies, standards, directives and other actions of the University and its constituent parts. Any policies, standards, directives and other actions of the University and its constituent parts shall be consistent with Board actions. To the extent permitted by law, the Board may review and intervene in any and all aspects of the University; modify any policy, standard, or directive; amend or rescind any existing policy, standard or directive; and enact and issue such policies, standards and directives as it deems proper for the University. The Board shall adopt a mission statement for the University in consultation with the faculty, students and staff members.

1.2         Appointment of the President of the University.  As provided in ORS 352.096, in consultation with the Governor, or the Governor’s designee, the Board shall appoint and employ a President of the University. Except in the case of an interim or acting president, the hiring committee for the president of the University shall include representatives of the university community and at least one other president of a public university based in Oregon. The President reports exclusively to the Board, and the Board supervises the President. The Board shall prescribe the President’s compensation and terms and conditions of employment and is responsible for the reappointment or removal of the President. The President shall perform such duties as are assigned by the Board. Except as otherwise provided by law or Board action, the President is the executive and governing officer of the University and President of the faculty. The President shall, periodically, report to the Board all significant matters within the President's knowledge related to the affairs of the University.

1.3         University Budget.  The Board shall adopt the budget of the University.

1.4         Tuition and Fees.

1.4.1     The Board shall determine tuition and mandatory enrollment fees in accordance with ORS 352.102, ORS 352.103, ORS 352.105, and other applicable law.

1.4.2     The President determines all other fees, fines and charges, after providing notice to the Board. In arriving at a determination of fees, fines and charges, the President shall consult with employees and students as the President deems appropriate.

1.5         Student Conduct. The Board has the authority to establish written standards of student conduct in consultation with the President, faculty and students.

                           

1.6         Business and Administrative Affairs. The Board retains authority for the following:

1.6.1     The approval of the naming of university buildings or outdoor areas in recognition of individuals or organizations.

1.6.2     The approval of the execution of instruments relating to real property where the anticipated cost or value to the University exceeds $8,500,000. However, a quarterly report to the Board is required for each execution of instruments relating to real property where the anticipated cost or value to the University exceeds $5,000,000 but is less than $8,500,000.

1.6.3     The approval of the appointment of external auditors.

1.6.4     The approval of a capital project budget that is anticipated to exceed $8,500,000, including for architects, construction managers, engineers, and other professional consultants; and approval of any increase to a board-approved capital project budget that causes the total of all increases to the capital project budget to exceed $8,500,000 or fifteen percent (15%) of the approved budget, whichever is greater. However, a quarterly report to the Board is required for each capital project that exceeds $5,000,000 but is less than $8,500,000.

1.6.5     The approval of the execution of instruments relating to any borrowing or debt finance transactions which are or may be in excess of $5,000,000, singularly or in the aggregate.

1.6.6     The approval of the execution of instruments relating to any shares, stock or other equity or interests in or obligations of any entity other than the University in excess of $5,000,000, unless the shares, stock or other equity or interests in or obligations of the entity are publicly traded or provided through the State Treasurer, University of Oregon Foundation or a brokerage firm, investment bank, depository or other licensed firm.

1.6.7     The approval of the execution of any other instruments, including but not limited to instruments related to the acquisition, disposal or provision of goods and services, where the anticipated cost or value to the University exceeds $5,000,000; and approval of any increase or decrease in cost or value that causes the total of all increases or decreases in cost or value to exceed $5,000,000. When the ultimate aggregate cost to the University is not known in advance for instruments relating to the acquisition, disposal or provision of goods or services on a continuing or intermittent basis (e.g. rental, service, or supply contracts), the amounts set forth in this paragraph shall be calculated on an annual basis.

1.6.8     The approval of the execution of any instrument that the President, Treasurer, Chair of the Board of Trustees, or a majority of the Trustees deems appropriate for consideration by the Board or a Board committee, so long as the instrument has not been executed.

 

1.7         Academic Programs; Degrees; Admissions. 

1.7.1     The Board has the authority to establish, eliminate, control, or substantially reorganize academic programs and units of operation. Any significant change in the University’s academic programs as defined by the Higher Education Coordinating Commission must be approved by the Board prior to submission to the Commission.

 

1.7.2     The Board confers academic degrees, certificates, and other forms of recognition upon the recommendation of the faculty. Such academic degrees, certificates and other forms of recognition are granted in the name of the Board of Trustees of the University of Oregon and are executed by the Board Chair and the University President. The Board reserves the right to review and approve the granting of any degree, certificate or recognition. The Board shall have the exclusive authority to approve honorary degrees.

1.7.3     Except as provided by Board action, the President of the University has the authority to establish standards, qualifications, policies, and practices relating to admission to study at the University and the curriculum, grading, credits, scholarships, and academic standards of the University. Except as set forth in law or Board action, the faculty (the "president and professors") has the immediate government and discipline of the university and the students therein and the authority to prescribe the course of study to be pursued in the University and the textbooks to be used.  The faculty shall have primary authority over choice of method of instruction; subject matter to be taught; academic standards for admitting students; and standards of student competence in a discipline.

1.8         Gifts.  The Board retains authority for the acceptance of the following gifts to the University:

1.8.1     Gifts that create obligations on the part of the University for which there is no established funding source.

1.8.2     Gifts with a value exceeding $5,000,000 which involve construction of facilities not previously approved, provided that gifts described in this subsection with a value between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000 will be reported to the Board of Trustees quarterly.

1.8.3     A gift requiring naming of a university building or outdoor area.

1.8.4     Any other gift that the President, Treasurer, or a majority of the Board of Trustees deems appropriate for Board consideration.

1.8.5     Gifts of real estate, interests in real estate, or gifts of debt instruments secured by real estate from other than the University of Oregon Foundation. The Treasurer shall determine in each such case, including when the gift is from the University of Oregon Foundation, whether a hazardous waste inquiry or other due diligence is required, and the scope and extent of such inquiry. The President and the Treasurer, in consultation with the Vice President for Advancement, shall establish further policies and procedures regarding evaluation of gifts of real estate, as may be necessary or desirable.

1.9         Gifts to the University of Oregon Foundation and the Alumni Association of the University of Oregon.  Gifts to the University of Oregon Foundation and the Alumni Association of the University of Oregon shall be accepted by the University of Oregon Foundation or Alumni Association of the University of Oregon, as appropriate, in accordance with then-current agreements between the University and the Foundation or the University and Association (as may be amended periodically).

2.0         Policies, Standards and Directives

2.1         Governing Documents. The University shall have the following governing documents:

2.1.1     Bylaws of the University of Oregon, policies, standards, directives and other actions approved by the Board of Trustees or a committee of the Board as appropriate ("Board actions").

2.1.2     Policies, standards and directives approved by the President of the University regarding matters within the authority of the President ("Presidential actions").

2.1.3     A University Constitution as described in this policy by which the President, professors and University constituencies shall exercise their shared governance roles.

2.2         Force of Law; Emergency and Temporary Actions. Board actions shall have the force of law to the extent set forth therein. Emergency and temporary Presidential actions may have the force of law to the extent set forth therein. Any Board action or Presidential action that is intended to have the force of law must include an opportunity for appeal.

2.3         Enforcement. Any Board action or Presidential action may be enforced by the University through internal procedures and in any court of competent jurisdiction. All Board actions and Presidential actions are binding on University employees, students, volunteers, contractors and members of the public, except as set forth therein.

               

3.0         Authority of the President of the University

3.1         Executive and Governing Officer; Delegation. The President of the University is the executive and governing officer of the University, except as otherwise provided by statute or Board actions. Subject to the supervision of the Board and Board action, the President shall direct the affairs of the University. The authorities and responsibilities of the President of the University include, but are not limited to, the authorities and responsibilities set forth in and modified by section 1.0 and this section 3.0, and the President may delegate any authorities and responsibilities, except as provided by Board actions. Any delegation must be consistent with Board actions. The President remains responsible for the proper functioning of the University, notwithstanding any delegation.

3.2         Policies, Standards and Directives; Consultation. The President of the University shall formulate, prescribe and issue Presidential actions regarding matters within the authority of the President when the Board or the President deems it necessary or appropriate. Any Presidential actions are subordinate to and must be consistent with Board actions. In carrying out these duties, the President shall consult with the faculty, other employees, and students as deemed appropriate by the President. Consultation shall not remove from the President the authority and the responsibility vested in the President by law and Board actions.

3.3         Emergency and Temporary Actions; Technical Corrections. The President of the University shall establish emergency and temporary policies, standards and directives when the Board or the President deems it necessary or appropriate. Such policies, standards and directives may have the scope and force of Board actions and must be reported to the Board expeditiously.

Pursuant to expedited procedures, the President of the University may amend Board actions and Presidential actions in order to correct typographical errors, make address or formatting changes, or clarify language without changing their effect. Such amendments must be reported to the Board quarterly. The President may make expedited repeals of Board actions (upon notice to the Board) and Presidential actions, provided that expedited repeals of Board actions must be ratified at the next Board or Executive Committee meeting.

3.4         Committees, Councils and Advisory Groups. The President of the University shall establish and define the charge of any and all University committees, councils, and advisory groups, except as provided in Board action. The establishment and charge of any and all University committees, councils and advisory groups shall be consistent with law and Board actions.  The recommendations and reports of all committees, councils and advisory groups shall be made to the President. The President shall inform the Executive Committee of the Board regarding significant recommendations and reports related to the affairs of the University. Upon request by the Chair of the Board or a majority of the Trustees, the President shall provide the Board with a recommendation or report of a University committee, council or advisory group.

3.5         Students. Subject to Board action, the President is responsible for development and administration of university policies and procedures governing the role of students and their conduct. In carrying out this responsibility, the President shall take into account the views of students, faculty, and others. The guidelines for student conduct which set forth prohibited conduct and provide for appropriate disciplinary hearings and sanctions for violations of institutional policies and procedures must be consistent with standards of procedural fairness. The Board recognizes and affirms the importance of active student involvement in the deliberative and decision-making processes.

3.6.        University Personnel.

3.6.1     The President of the University shall act for the Board of Trustees regarding all personnel and employment matters, including labor relations and approval of collective bargaining agreements. Subject to Board action, the President has the exclusive authority to and shall establish necessary or appropriate written policies, standards and directives covering all employees not represented by a collective bargaining organization and necessary or appropriate written policies, standards and directives covering employees represented by a collective bargaining organization, subject to any legal obligation to negotiate the terms and conditions of such policies, standards and directives with the exclusive representative of the relevant bargaining unit. Subject to ORS 352.076, upon request by the Chair of the Board or a majority of the Board, the President shall provide the Board with requested information regarding personnel and employment matters, including labor relations and collective bargaining.

3.6.2     In a manner consistent with applicable state law and applicable collective bargaining agreements, the President may appoint any instructional, research, administrative, professional, trade, occupational and other personnel as are necessary or appropriate and establish their compensation and other terms and conditions of employment.

3.6.3     The President may appoint volunteers as necessary or appropriate and establish the terms and conditions of the activities of such appointed volunteers.

3.6.4     Subject to any collective bargaining agreements, the President has the authority to establish written codes of conduct for instructional, research, administrative, professional, trade, occupational and other personnel, including volunteers.

3.7         Research Grants and Contracts. The President of the University shall act for the Board of Trustees regarding grants and contracts for research, development, service, and training. However, a quarterly report to the Board is required for each initial contract or grant award that exceeds $5,000,000, and when any increase or decrease to a contract or grant award causes the total of all increases or decreases to the contract or grant award to exceed $5,000,000.

3.8         Execution and Administration of University Affairs. Except as provided by Board action, the President of the University shall act for the Board regarding the execution and administration of instruments and the affairs of the University.  Notwithstanding the dollar limits specified in section 1.0 above, the President shall act for the Board of Trustees regarding the execution and administration of all instruments, business affairs, and operations relating to:

3.8.1     Acquisition of electricity, natural gas, sewer, water, and all other utility services;

3.8.2     Subcontracts for collaborative research entered into in furtherance of sponsored research programs.

3.8.3     The acquisition of goods and services made by participating in contracts entered into by group purchasing organizations or pursuant to collaborative purchasing initiatives with public or non-profit entities.

3.8.4     The acquisition of fixtures, equipment and furnishings that are included in capital project budgets that have been authorized by the Board of Trustees.

3.8.5     The acquisition of goods and services for sponsored research programs when the source of the goods or services is directed by the sponsor, or the sponsor retains title to the goods acquired.

3.8.6     The settlement of claims or lawsuits brought against the University.

3.8.7     The acquisition of insurance or self-insurance.

3.8.8     Leases and licenses of real property and modifications thereto of up to 20 years.

3.8.9     The acceptance of current gifts of non-traditional investment assets, including but not limited to charitable lead trusts, bargain sale gifts of property, and partial interest gifts.

3.8.10   The acceptance of deferred gift assets.

3.8.11   Real property acquired through gift or devise from the University of Oregon Foundation.

3.8.12   The protection of the University's interests, property, and operations in an emergency.

3.8.13   Actions and execution of documents necessary to establish legal entities, controlled by the University, through which the University may conduct business.

3.8.14   The selection of depositories and investments.

3.8.15   Instruments from the Higher Education Coordinating Commission, including, but not limited to, grant or loan agreements, to convey funds or state appropriation to the University. 

3.8.16   The execution of instruments or the conduct of business affairs where approval by the Board or a Board committee is impractical due to time or other constraints. The President shall submit a report of any actions taken pursuant to this delegation to the Board of Trustees or its Executive Committee on or before the next regularly scheduled meeting.

3.9         Legal Action. The President of the University shall act for the Board of Trustees regarding all legal action necessary or appropriate to protect the interests of the University. However, no litigation shall be instituted against a public entity or official or in exercise of the power of eminent domain without approval by the Board of Trustees.

3.10       Gifts.  Subject to Board action, the President of the University shall act for the Board of Trustees regarding all current and deferred gifts to the University, including gifts to establish quasi-endowed or permanently endowed funds. Notwithstanding any delegation by the President, a gift with unusual terms or conditions affecting an academic program shall be accepted only with the concurrence of the President to the proposed terms or conditions. The proceeds of any gift, devise, bequest, or contribution received by the University shall be administered in accordance with the intention of the donor and any directions of the Board of Trustees in accepting the gift. Wherever possible, the University of Oregon Foundation shall manage gifts. The President of the University is authorized to act for the Board of Trustees regarding the disposition of gifts.

3.11       Fees, Fines and Charges.  Subject to Board action and applicable laws, the President of the University shall establish fees, fines, and charges after providing notice to the Board. In arriving at a determination of fees, fines and charges, the President shall consult with employees and students as the President deems appropriate. The President shall enforce the collection of tuition, mandatory enrollment fees, other fees, fines, charges, and all other amounts due to the University.

3.12       Transparency Practices. As described in ORS 352.076, the President shall conduct ongoing reviews of the practices and policies of the university relating to transparency and access. When conducting the reviews the President shall include faculty, nonfaculty staff and student representatives.

 

4.0         Authority of the Faculty

4.1         Role of the Faculty. As provided in ORS 352.146, the faculty, which consists of the President and the professors, has:

4.1.1     The immediate government and discipline of the university and the students therein, except as otherwise provided by law or action of the Board.

4.1.2     The authority, subject to the supervision of the Board, to prescribe the course of study to be pursued in the University and the textbooks to be used.

4.2         The President and the Professors. The President and the professors constitute the faculty. The President of the University is the president of the faculty. Shared governance, as a principle in American higher education, is embedded in longstanding practices, and reflects the regard for all stakeholders in the academic endeavors of the University.

4.3         Higher Education Coordinating Commission. Any significant change in the University’s academic programs as defined by the Higher Education Coordinating Commission must be approved by the Board committee responsible for academic affairs prior to submission to the Commission.

4.4         University Constitution. The faculty has adopted a University Constitution which was ratified by the President in 2011. A University Constitution, and any amendments to it, must be consistent with law and Board actions.

4.5         Modification. A University Constitution is subject to modification as set forth therein or by the Board of Trustees in consultation with the President and the professors consistent with applicable law.

5.0         Channel of Authority

The faculty and officers and employees of the University shall, through appropriate channels, be responsible to the President of the University and through the President to the Board of Trustees, except that the Treasurer, General Counsel and Secretary are responsible to the Board in relation to the business of the Board.

Chapter/Volume: 
  • Volume I: Governance
  • Chapter 1: Governance and board affairs

Student Loan Debt Management and Outreach

Reason for Policy: 

Requires all Oregon University System institutions to help all students who borrow federal student loans to understand their rights and responsibilities regarding their student loan borrowing, debt, and repayment; and to provide additional support and programs beyond federally mandated counseling to assist students, especially those considered most "at-risk," throughout their time at an OUS institution.

Enactment & Revision History: 

Became University of Oregon policy by operation of law on July 1, 2014.
Former Oregon State Board of Higher Education Policy

APPROVAL DATE: 6/21/2013
EFFECTIVE DATE: 7/1/2013
HISTORICAL DETAIL NOTES: Approved by OSBHE on 6/21/2013, pending legal review. OUS General Counsel reviewed and approved the policy on 7/1/2013.

Policy: 

That Oregon University System institutions* will:

1. Help all students who borrow federal student loans to understand their rights and responsibilities regarding their student loan borrowing, debt, and repayment throughout the students’ time at the institution;

2. Develop and maintain an early warning system to identify and intervene with students who are most at-risk of incurring higher-than-average student loan debt, and provide a targeted strategy of education and outreach beyond federally mandated Entrance and Exit Counseling. This includes students in one or more of the following categories: considered “low-income” by definition of federal and State of Oregon financial aid criteria; studying in degree fields that typically make lower than average salaries (such as social work, arts); studying in degree fields with higher than average borrowing based on program cost (such as law, medicine, certain healthcare fields) and in which graduates may not earn salaries comparable with debt incurred; and students on academic probation who are at-risk of dropping out before earning a degree.

3. Adopt and use the Federal Financial Aid Shopping Sheet or its successor document, by October 1, 2013, in order to provide clear, transparent information to student loan borrowers about gross and net costs and aid options at the institution, as well as the graduation rate, loan default rate, and median borrowing specific to that institution, and information on loan repayment choices; and provide easy web or other access to and information about net price calculators, and students’ current and cumulative debt incurred to-date through available links to federal databases and other resources.

4. Incorporate financial literacy into new student orientation programs, academic success classes, residence hall programming, and other similar orientation and outreach programs.

5. Provide student loan borrowing and management information on institutions’ respective web sites, providing guidance before, during, and after college on ways to manage and repay student loans.

6. Track and report on an annual basis to the Oregon State Board of Higher Education data that demonstrates the types of debt counseling and management efforts taking place at the university and reports on indicators of progress and of reaching the most at-risk students with effective outreach efforts.

* Includes Eastern Oregon University, Oregon Institute of Technology, Oregon State University, Portland State University, Southern Oregon University, University of Oregon, and Western Oregon University; and branch, satellite and other campus centers of these campuses.

Chapter/Volume: 
Original Source: 
OUS Board Policy

Legal Review of Agreements and Documents

Policy Number: 
I.02.01
Reason for Policy: 

This policy outlines matters pertaining to legal review of agreements and documents.

Entities Affected by this Policy: 

All individuals affiliated with the UO who interact with University legal procedures.

Responsible Office: 

For questions about this policy, please contact the Office of the General Counsel at (541) 346-3082 or gcounsel@uoregon.edu.

Enactment & Revision History: 

06 January 2020 - Revisions approved by the university president

01 July 2014 - Former OUS Internal Management Directive; became a University of Oregon policy by operation of law

Policy: 
  1. Legal Review
    1. The following agreements or documents must be drafted or reviewed by an attorney in the UO’s Office of the General Counsel. The attorneys providing these legal services are reviewing or drafting the following agreements in order to evaluate legal risk and to confirm compliance with applicable federal and state laws, including constitutional provisions, statutes, administrative rules, and UO policies.
      1. Any agreement for the purchase or sale of real property or the purchase or sale of improvements to real property;
      2. Employment agreements or notices of appointments for the President, Vice Presidents, Provost, Vice Provosts, Athletic Director, Head Coaches, or any other employee with an annual salary in excess of $300,000;
      3. Employment agreements with other than tenured faculty for a term of three years or longer;
      4. Any agreement with a value in excess of $250,000:
        1. which includes the development of software or acquisition of software not “off-the-shelf”; or
        2. which includes a foreign entity, public or private, or an Indian tribe as a party; or
        3. under which UO provides services; or
        4. under which UO provides tangible or intangible property or the right to use tangible or intangible property.
      5. Any agreement under which UO takes equity in a company in which UO provides services, tangible or intangible property, or the right to use tangible or intangible property;
      6. Any settlement agreement or release of claims;
      7. Any faculty or student exchange agreement under which UO will pay or receive money or property;
      8. Any docket materials from UO on a matter submitted to the UO Board for action;
      9. Any non-utility easement; and
      10. Any solicitation documents for a competitive procurement that will result in a contract or agreement subject to this Policy.
    2. The legal review required by this Policy may be accomplished, for applicable transactions, by form or template agreements drafted or reviewed by a UO General Counsel attorney and made available to the relevant department or personnel at UO.
    3. In conjunction with the General Counsel’s Office, UO units may develop an internal process in order to exempt categories or sub-categories included in this Policy from legal review or to add categories or sub-categories to the list for legal review, as appropriate. The process should identify how legal risk, notwithstanding an exemption, will be reasonably managed. A category or sub-category may not be exempted or added to the list in Section A(1) until the process document is on file with and approved by the Vice President for Finance and Administration or designee. Once a process document is filed with and approved by the Vice President for Finance and Administration or designee, the exemptions or additions will be added to the list above in Section A(1).
    4. Internal process developed to exempt or add categories or sub-categories to the list in Section A(1) may include “catch-all” provisions to the extent appropriate based on the expertise and personnel in particular UO unit.
    5. Any agreement or document subject to legal review under this Policy must include evidence of such review, such as the attorney’s signature or communication from the attorney attached to the agreement or document. For instances in which a unit is using a form or template agreement as contemplated by Section (A)(2) of this Policy, notation or reference to the form or template drafted by the attorney is sufficient for this section.
    6. Nothing in this Policy removes or alters other requirements for the proper execution of an agreement or document, such as signature by an authorized contracting authority or compliance with procurement rules, policies or procedures, or other UO policies and requirements.
    7. Notwithstanding the list of agreements and documents included in this Policy, employees are encouraged to approach agreements and documents from a risk-conscious perspective and seek out legal review and advice proactively. Nothing in this Policy prevents or should discourage legal review of agreements or documents not included in Section (A)(1)(a)-(j).
  1. Review
    1. This Policy may be reviewed annually by the Vice President for Finance and Administration and other relevant stakeholders for amendment or revision, with specific care to consider how risk is managed by the inclusion, or exclusion, of particular categories or sub-categories.
Chapter/Volume: 
  • Volume I: Governance
  • Chapter 2: Legal affairs
Original Source: 
Internal Management Directive

Pages

Subscribe to University of Oregon Policy Library RSS