Students

Fund Raising on Campus, Authorization of

Effective Date: 
01/04/1985
Last Updated: 
01/04/1985
Issued by: 
Vice-President for Administration
Reviewed and Approved By: 
President's Staff
Policy Statement: 

Procedure:

1. To obtain official authorization to conduct on campus fund raising, write a memorandum outlining the purpose of the fund raising activity, identifying the sponsor(s), and indicating how and where collected monies will be deposited and dispersed. Send or deliver this memorandum to the Office of the President at least two weeks prior to the planned activity. The President or the President's designee shall respond as promptly as possible to the request.

(a) The President may request further information and/or endorsement by the appropriate Vice-President prior to making a decision about whether or not to authorize the fund raising activity.

(b) Fund raisers shall present a copy of the President's authorization when requesting space reservations, use of campus mail service, or other University services in connection with the fund raising, event(s).

2. Use of campus mail service for fund raising is limited to approved institutional fund drives or other fund raising activities authorized by the University President or the President's authorized representative.(OAR 571-11-005).

3. Solicitation of funds from students is governed by OAR 571-11-005 and OAR 571-11-010.

4. Solicitation of funds from off campus donors is governed by OAR 571-11-005 and University of Oregon Policy Statement 7.000: Foundation Practice and Procedure "Access to Prospective Donors for Gifts of $5,000 or More."

Date: 
01/04/1985
Reason for Policy: 

To describe procedure for obtaining permission to conduct fund raising on campus and to provide rule citations on which procedures are based.

Date: 
01/04/1985
Revision History: 

08 February 2010 - Policy number revised from 6.000 to 06.00.04

04 January 1985 - Reviewed and Approved by the university president's staff

04 January 1985 - Issued by the university vice-president for Administration

Equipment

Effective Date: 
04/04/1986
Last Updated: 
04/04/1986
Issued by: 
Vice-President for Administration
Reviewed and Approved By: 
President's Staff
Policy Statement: 

Individual departments or other units of the University are charged with stewardship responsibility for the equipment under their control. However, ownership of University equipment is vested in the University of Oregon on behalf of the Oregon State Board of Higher Education, and not in any specific unit or department regardless of whether the equipment was purchased with University funds or donated by an external agency or private individual. Such items need not be listed on the University's equipment inventory to qualify as University equipment.

University equipment may be used only in the conduct of University-related activities. Except as required for the proper accomplishment of the University's mission or for the obvious and recognized purposes of an individual unit or department, University equipment may not be borrowed by, or rented or loaned to any person or group for non-University purposes without the prior written approval of the Vice-President for Administration, on the recommendation of the appropriate dean or director.

Department heads and unit directors may loan or rent equipment under their stewardship to other units of the University for University purposes and are free to transfer control of equipment to other University units upon the agreement of both unit directors and in compliance with University inventory control procedures.
They also may negotiate with equipment vendors for the trade-in value of equipment they intend to replace in compliance with State Board purchasing policies and procedures.

When an item listed on the University's equipment inventory is no longer needed or when it is judged to be of no value, the Office of Business Affairs shall be notified. The Office of Business Affairs is authorized to declare such equipment surplus or scrap and to determine how it shall be disposed of according to appropriate State Board policies and procedures.

(See also OAR 580-50-035 and FASOM 02.40A[2], 4101, 4102, 4111, 4113, 4150, 4201)

 

Date: 
04/04/1986
Reason for Policy: 

To identify limitations on use and disposal of University equipment.

Date: 
04/04/1986
Revision History: 

08 February 2010 - Policy number revised from 4.000 to 04.00.06

04 April 1986 - Issued by VP for Administration; approved by the university president's staff

Categories: 

Criminal, Credit and Related Background Checks on Applicants for University Positions

Effective Date: 
09/30/2008
Last Updated: 
09/30/2008
Issued by: 
Vice President for Finance and Administration
Policy Statement: 

The university will conduct criminal, credit and related background checks on finalists for designated positions as necessary to ensure a safe and secure work environment in which university faculty, staff, students, resources and assets are protected. In addition to the background checks described here, reference checks on employment history and other checks will also be conducted as appropriate. Note: the criminal background checks covered by this policy do not include nationwide fingerprint-based criminal records checks.

The University of Oregon, Office of Human Resources will be responsible for administering, interpreting, and maintaining this policy. Questions regarding this policy should be directed to the Director of Talent Acquisition and Development, Human Resources, 677 East 12th Avenue (PeaceHealth North Building), Eugene, OR 97403.

Applicability:
This policy will apply to finalists for job searches conducted after August 1, 2008 on:

  • Applicants for designated positions in unclassified, classified, graduate teaching fellow, and student employment; volunteers.
  • Current employees applying for internal promotion or transfer to designated positions. (See SEIU Collective Bargaining Agreement, LOA "Criminal Background Checks Policy Implementation" for classified employees.)

Types of background checks and designated positions:
Criminal background checks will be conducted to ensure that the candidate does not have relevant criminal convictions that would make him or her unsuitable or ineligible to perform the responsibilities of a specific position. A conviction includes a plea of no contest, plea of guilty, or court determination of guilt.

Criminal background checks will be conducted for positions that include the following access and/or with the following responsibilities:

  • Unsupervised access to children (does not include university students under 18) and vulnerable adults (persons 18 years of age or older who have substantial mental or functional impairments and are unable to protect themselves).
  • Access to computer infrastructure, systems or applications that have data deemed to be sensitive, as well as anyone involved in providing computer security services;
  • Broad and extensive access to personally identifying information about students, faculty, staff, alumni, donors, or research subjects;
  • Direct access to and handling of cash and cash equivalents (i.e., checks, credit card receipts, negotiable securities);
  • Ability to modify business or financial records after transactions have been processed through regular approval queues and/or review processes;
  • Public safety and campus security;
  • Unrestricted access to building master keys, security systems or areas where people have reasonable expectation of privacy;
  • Direct access to controlled substances and potentially hazardous chemicals; and
  • Access to animal research facilities.

Credit background checks will be conducted to ensure that the candidate's background has no financial irregularities that would make the individual unsuitable or ineligible to perform the responsibilities of a specific position. (Note: Federal law prohibits discrimination as a result of bankruptcy.) Credit background checks will be conducted as appropriate for positions with the following responsibilities:

  • Broad and extensive access to personally identifying information about students, faculty, staff, alumni, donors, or research subjects;
  • Direct access to and handling of cash and cash equivalents (i.e., checks, credit card receipts, negotiable securities);
  • Public safety and campus security.

Designated positions:
The Associate Vice President (AVP) for Human Resources, the Assistant Director of Human Resources, or the Human Resources Employment Manager, will designate those positions requiring criminal and/or credit background checks, using the criteria described above and in consultation with the hiring supervisor. The designation will be applied after reviewing specific job duties and requirements and, in most cases, will not be applied generally to all jobs in a classification or employment category. This process will apply to both criminal and credit background checks.

Determination of relevance of criminal and credit background information: Not all criminal convictions or financial problems will preclude applicants from university employment. The criminal and/or credit background report(s) will be reviewed for the type of offense (if any) and its relevance to the position and a determination made if the information received in the background check disqualifies the candidate from that specific job. This decision will be made by at least two of the following: the AVP for Human Resources, the Assistant Human Resources Director, and/or the Employment Manager in consultation with the hiring supervisor. In addition, staff in the Department of Public Safety, Business Affairs Office, and/or Office of Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity may be consulted.

An unsuccessful finalist will be informed that he/she is not eligible to fill the position based on the unsatisfactory results of a check and notified of the appeal process.

Position posting notification and release authorization:
Recruitment announcements and job postings for positions designated as requiring one or more background check will include a standard statement notifying potential applicants of the intent to conduct a criminal and/or credit background check(s).

A finalist for a position requiring criminal and/or credit background check(s) must sign the university release authorization form. The release form will inform the applicant that criminal convictions do not necessarily preclude employment. In addition, the release form will provide the finalist a summary of rights, including the right of access to credit and/or criminal background check(s) information and a description of the appeal process.

As part of the recruitment process, applicants will be informed of the university policy on confidential handling of documents related to background checks.

Confidentiality and restricted access to records:
Information received from criminal and credit background checks will be considered sensitive and disclosure will be restricted. Files pertaining to background checks will be maintained in Human Resources.

Appeal Process:
Applicants who are denied employment based on unsatisfactory results will receive notification of rights under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, including his/her right to review the results and obtain information about contacting agencies that provided the background check(s) results.

Unsuccessful applicants will also be given the opportunity to submit a statement in writing to the AVP for Human Resources describing how the information in the report is incorrect or irrelevant to the position in question. In consultation with the appropriate vice president or designee, the AVP will make the final determination of the appeal.

Legally mandated checks:
Some university positions carry legally mandated background check requirements imposed by outside entities. The university will ensure that these checks are conducted for those engaged to work in these positions, which include, but are not limited to, the following programs:

  • Child care centers;
  • Programs that work with children (e.g., Youth Enrichment/TAG, Psychology research labs working with minors, and Child and Family Center); and
  • Communication Disorders and Sciences
  • Programs that involve work requiring background checks by federal or state agencies such as Homeland Security, Drug Enforcement Agency, or the Nuclear Regulatory Agency.
Revision History: 

04 November 2010 - Reviewed by HR; no changes needed.

08 February 2010 - Policy number revised from 3.110 to 03.09.01

30 September 2008 - Reviewed and Approved by the university president's staff

Written Reprimands

Effective Date: 
10/27/1993
Last Updated: 
10/27/1993
Issued by: 
President
Policy Statement: 

A written reprimand is a serious disciplinary action. A written reprimand, a letter from a responsible University supervisor to an employee of the University in which that employee's unsatisfactory or unacceptable behavior or work performance is described and the necessity for change is noted. A reprimand also warns of future disciplinary procedures that shall be taken in the absence of improved performance. A written reprimand is often in order when previous oral or written warnings have not had their hoped for effect. Certain circumstances may warrant issuing a written reprimand as the first disciplinary action taken against an employee. A written reprimand can be distinguished from a written warning or admonition in that a reprimand is placed in an employee's personnel file and retained there for a predetermined amount of time.

Reason for Policy: 

To describe the purposes for which written reprimands are appropriately issued and to establish procedures for issuing written reprimands and maintaining them in University files.

Procedures: 

When a supervisor believes that issuing a written reprimand to a classified, or student employee, may be appropriate, the supervisor should consult with the Director of the Office of Human Resources to make sure that all appropriate University policies, procedures, and contractual relationships are observed.

When a supervisor believes that issuing a written reprimand to a member of the faculty may be appropriate, the supervisor should contact the vice president to whom the supervisor is responsible to make sure that all appropriate University policies and procedures are observed.

Formal processes, such as a hearing by a peer panel, that must be made available to employees before sanctions more serious than written reprimands may be imposed are not required prior to issuing a written reprimand. However, employees do have the right to know with specificity what behavior or performance has been found to be deficient and to respond to or dispute the findings, before a written reprimand may be issued. Providing this opportunity to the employee to be heard may be accomplished either in a face-to-face meeting between the supervisor and the employee, with any representatives the parties may wish to have present, or it may take place in writing. In either case, the supervisor must tell the employee what the deficient behavior is, and ask for any information, explanation, or other evidence that the employee may have that might change the supervisor's understanding of the situation. Supervisors have the responsibility to consider any information or contrary evidence the employee may submit before issuing a letter of reprimand.

A written reprimand should be in letter form addressed to the employee and signed by the supervisor. It should be delivered to the employee in confidence or sent via the U.S. Postal Service with a return receipt requested, and it should contain the following elements:

1. A description of the behavior or performance that has been found to be unacceptable or unsatisfactory. If University rules or policies have been violated, those should be cited.

2. A description of the supervisor's expectations for future behavior or work performance or any suggested or required remedial activities that the employee must undertake or should consider undertaking.

3. A description of any further disciplinary processes and sanctions that may be pursued if the employee does not improve or repeats the unacceptable behavior.

4. The period of time that the written reprimand shall remain in the employee's personnel file.

5. Notice to the employee that he or she has the right to place a rebuttal of the written reprimand in the personnel file to be retained there so long as the written reprimand is also present.

Written reprimands are documents relating to employee discipline, and therefore are confidential under state law and university policy. It is a violation of law and policy to disclose such personal information to anyone who does not have a University imposed need to know, The University may acknowledge to those inquiring that institutional action has been taken regarding an employee, but the existence of a written reprimand or any of the reprimand's contents may not be disclosed.

Revision History: 

08 February 2010 - Policy number revised from 3.01 to 03.04.04

27 October 1993 - Reviewed and Recommended by the university president's staff

Supersedes 7 March 1986 Procedure Guideline: Written Reprimands

Drug-free Workplace

Effective Date: 
03/08/1989
Last Updated: 
05/13/2011
Policy Statement: 
 
The illegal use, possession, or distribution of drugs and alcohol on institutionally-owned or controlled property or as part of any University activity is proscribed conduct (See Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 580-22-045(8)). The manufacture of illegal drugs on institutionally-owned or controlled property is a malicious misuse or an unauthorized use of institutional property and is also proscribed conduct (See Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 58O-22-045(5) and (7).
 
The University may impose disciplinary sanctions against any student or employee found to have violated this rule, consistent with applicable provisions of state laws and regulations, collective bargaining agreements and University and Oregon State Board of Higher Education administrative rules. The permissible sanctions include, but are not limited to, suspension. without pay, and termination of employment. The University also reserves the right to refer employees' and students' actions to appropriate civil authorities for possible prosecution.
 
All University employees must agree to abide by the University's rules and policies as a condition of their employment. In addition, all University employees shall receive annually a written copy of this policy statement.
 
Federal law and this policy require all University employees, as a condition of their employment, to notify the University within five days should they be convicted for violating, while at the workplace, any criminal drug statute. Employees shall give such notification in writing to their immediate supervisor with a copy to the Office of Human Resources. The University is then required to notify the applicable Federal agency if the employee is directly or indirectly engaged in the performance of a federal grant or contract. The Office of Human Resources will contact the Office of the Vice President for Research to determine the appropriate notification process. The University's Vice President for Research shall notify the granting or contracting agency (if required) within ten days of receiving notice that a person employed on any of the University's federal grants and contracts was convicted of violating, while at the workplace, a criminal drug statute.
 
The University shall impose an appropriate sanction on and/or shall require satisfactory participation in a drug abuse treatment program by any employee convicted of a criminal drug statute violation as described above. Students and employees whom the University finds to have violated the University's rules and policies on the use of drugs and alcohol on campus shall be subject to discipline without regard for the activities of other governmental agencies.
 
The University, through its Office of Human Resources, shall maintain a drug-free awareness program to inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse, and the availability of the Employee Assistance Program, drug counseling, rehabilitation, and other assistance programs. In addition, all employees shall receive descriptions of applicable legal sanctions under local, state, or federal law and health risks associated with the abuse of drugs and alcohol.
 
The Office of Human Resources and the Chief Student Affairs Officer shall arrange for the distribution of materials mandated by law and this policy to new and existing employees and students respectively. They shall also be responsible for conducting a biennial review of the University program monitoring legislative changes and ensuring that the appropriate offices comply.
Reason for Policy: 

In compliance with the provisions of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 and the Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act Amendments of 1989, to set forth the University's policies on the illegal use of drugs and alcohol by its employees.

Revision History: 
Supersedes all earlier policies issued on this subject.

13 May 2011 - Reviewed by Human Resources; no changes needed

08 February 2010 - Policy number revised from 3.350 and 3.550 to 03.04.03

12 December 1990 - Reissued by the university president with revisions

08 March 1989 - Originally issued
Audience: 

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - Students